The video link I posted the guy tried to de bunk their results.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The video link I posted the guy tried to de bunk their results.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just from reading their website in the link I attached, in the third paragraph they refer to tube and fin construction.That's funny because most people use the bar and plate Garrett cores. Like ATP, etc.
In fact, I don't think I have ever seen a tube and fin Garrett core in the last 20+ years of tuning turbocharged cars.
A search for Garrett tube and fin yields nothing but bar and plate.
Honestly the only advantage I have seen of tube and fin is weight but their price usually out weighs (see what I did there) the advantage.
Garrett cores:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yes you are correct my original intent was to talk about the two types of intercooler designs and in particular which one was better suited for the FiST.To expand on my previous post, I assumed the question that started the thread was referring to the specific application , the Fiesta ST since this is a Fiesta ST forum and not a debate about the merits of tube and fin vs bar and plate.
For the particular application and overall performance, we have found that a tube and fin performs optimally better when you consider air flow requirements for the other heat exchangers in the cooling pack. Additionally continued heat transfer is good compared to typical bar and plate designs that can quickly become heat soaked. As I mentioned, bar and plate type do perform well on short term applications such as a dyno pull. Modern cars have far greater cooling needs than cars of 5 and 10 years ago. Engines run at higher operating temperatures and frontal air inlet areas have become smaller. This makes the requirement for air flow even greater and was just one of the factors that lead us to use the type of core we did. So to be clear, yes bar and plate do cool charge air temps very well but there is much more to consider in this particular application. Cheers-Ken