Joined
·
133 Posts
imo, yes they are worth it. I love mine and they look great. Get a lot of nice comments on mine.
Maybe not, but they still pull off comfort for me.I'm a big person, the Recaros are snug at first, but you get used to them and then they're more comfortable.
Keep in mind, the primary purpose of the Recaro seats isn't comfort, but Gluteal Stability Control
Easy cheap fix. Might consider that n the future as a solution. Usually there is one spot of my commute that has a fun few bends so I got tossed about, but if decide to road trip to some mountain roads or the track I'd probably get one for that.If you want more support for spirited driving while retaining the stock ST seats, what about a clip-in 3-point harness?
http://www.andysautosport.com/ford/...seats/seat_harnesses/sparco/spco00003149.html
Something like that will keep you planted, but can be removed when you don't need it. I have a 4-point for my Focus SVT that I use for autocross, and it really does the trick.
This actually looks really nice, do you know how its installed?If you want more support for spirited driving while retaining the stock ST seats, what about a clip-in 3-point harness?
http://www.andysautosport.com/ford/...seats/seat_harnesses/sparco/spco00003149.html
Something like that will keep you planted, but can be removed when you don't need it. I have a 4-point for my Focus SVT that I use for autocross, and it really does the trick.
I also went with the stock seats because I couldn't justify the price increase, and for a daily driver, I'm quite happy with them. I finally tried the Recaros at the New York Auto Show (after driving in the stock seats for a few months), and while I really liked the side bolstering, I didn't like the head rest angle, either. If they had offered the Recaros in full cloth without the heating element and with a less aggressive head rest for under a grand, I probably would have gone for them, but as they're offered at $2K, I have no regrets about picking the stock seats.I went with the regular seats because I didn't think the car was worth 10% more. At first I regretted it and tried changing my order, but got locked in with the standard seats. The standard seats are comfortable and I do little spirited driving, but when I do, I really wish i had some bolstering. I get tossed around. I'd be happy with both but Definitely don't regret not having them and I enjoy my car as 20k car.
The biggest perk to the non Recaros is being able to spread your legs and put your head back without your head being pitched forward by the head rest . And lumbar when you want it. If I remember correctly my lower back never even touched the Recaros unless I was slouched in there.
Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk
whoa... never use child seat anchors for adult harnessbelts. they are not strong enough for the weight of an adult.The rear clips just hook into the child carseat anchor points. Not sure about the front clips. @Smokin might be able to help with that. My 4-point harness is a bolt-in, and so I bolted them into the belt anchor points on the front floor for the lap portion, and the rear belt anchor points for the shoulder belts. Autocross is my primary activity with the SVTF, so I didn't need a clip-in fitment.
(Edited for new information.)whoa... never use child seat anchors for adult harnessbelts. they are not strong enough for the weight of an adult.
The expense of manufacturing the Recaro seats isn't that much different from manufacturing the standard seats, certainly not $2000 more. That is partly where the "too expensive" rational comes from. Many people just couldn't afford the $2000, regardless of perceived benefits. Whether they are worth the $2000 to you is a different story.I don't understand the argument against them on price either....
At 6" tall 240lbs they are tight, I have a wide back and my back does not touch the back of the seat.
At least I have a good reason to loose weight.