Ford Fiesta ST Forum banner
1 - 13 of 34 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
1,033 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Watching the gauges for charge air temp, ambient, and IAT seem to point to an adequately sized intercooler. I hope this holds up as the weather gets warmer, too. FWIW, we've had a couple days around 80 deg F, and there isn't any evidence of heat soaking the IC. This might be the first stock turbo car I've ever owned that enjoys this!

If you watch the various dyno videos, you'll see very consistent runs. The guys at Edmund's also pointed this out. Almost every car faces a heat issue on the dyno, so this is very encouraging. It bodes well for track days in the summer!

That aside, I could see a bigger intercooler, but it's not a priority for me now. For those that have it, do you have instrumented changes for before and after?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,033 Posts
Discussion Starter · #7 ·
While I'm happy with the stock intercooler, that isn't to say there isn't room for improvement! :)

I don't expect to jam a significantly bigger IC, but I would like a more efficient unit (less pressure drop)!

Mountune makes just the unit and this is something I'd like to test in the near future.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,033 Posts
Discussion Starter · #16 ·
Cobb Surgeline is 5 miles from my house. When I get some time I'm going to schedule some dyno pulls and post them up!
McRib-I wasn't saying we wouldn't benefit from a bigger intercooler, I was just noticing how the Fist has much better flow to it than the FoST.
Right on, we're on the same page. I expect a nominal gain under normal use, but better "resistance to loss" under severe loads. We'll see. :)
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,033 Posts
Discussion Starter · #18 ·
Mountune offers this in black powdercoat, and I decided it would go nicely with my car's black theme!

Since this has to be OE quality for warranty purposes, they powdercoat all of them. Here in CA, it doesn't matter very much! ;)

I took some comparison shots -- the core is modestly bigger and the construction is of obviously superior quality.

Early on, I'm seeing a pretty big difference in intake temperatures! It's almost always a few degrees over ambient and cools faster under airflow.

Hopefully this means I won't have heatsoak issues under any condition!

Once you get the front fascia off, it's a pretty easy job. If you're being careful, it will take a couple hours to install. I'm very happy with it and recommend it wholeheartedly!

Auto part


Bumper Auto part


Edit: fixed typo
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,033 Posts
Discussion Starter · #21 ·
The real question is, would you notice? Is there enough performance difference that you'd be able to easily tell?
Since I drive around with my AP always on, the numbers are actually quite different. I've done some before and after datalogging and will do more today. The weather conditions are the same. Conservatively it's consistently several degrees cooler. It takes a lot to bring it meaningfully higher than ambient -- even then it cools right off.

Your point remains valid -- you won't feel it until the heat gets to a point where it affects power. That takes a lot on this little car!

It could my imagination but seeing the cooler intake temps makes me feel like it used to feel when driving in the cooler evenings.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,033 Posts
Discussion Starter · #23 ·
Nice
In for numbers :)
Okay, here's one sample:

Ambient 72 deg F, 15 minutes of spirited driving, stock OE intercooler would allow intake temp to spike to 91 deg F.

Same cycle and conditions with Mountune IC peaked at 82 deg F, it took longer to get there, and was around 78 for the most part. It also cooled back to 75 once out of boost and moving at 30MPH.

Both running the 91 Cobb map on the same 91 octane fuel. Repeatable runs in my local industrial park loop.

Knock count was zero for both and -1 OAR-L. No apparent loss of power on either.
 
1 - 13 of 34 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top